Gross NPA vs Net NPA

Every time a bank lends money, it takes a calculated risk. Most borrowers repay. Some don't. For any bank, a Non-Performing Asset (NPA) is a loan on which the borrower has stopped making any repayments for more than 90 days. Loans are assets for banks and an NPA no longer generates income for the bank. This loan is a defunct asset now.

NPAs are the most important indicator of a bank's financial health, at times more than profitability. When they rise, profits shrink, lending slows and investors lose their confidence. When they fall, (after the right efforts over a few quarters) the banks breathe easy.

What Is Gross NPA?

Gross NPA (GNPA) is the total value of all bad loans of a bank before considering any provisions made against those loans. Simply put, gross NPA answers, “How much of the bank's loan book has gone bad?” It tells you exactly how much of the loan book is in trouble.

How to Calulate Gross NPA?

Gross NPA Ratio = (Total Gross NPAs / Gross Advances) × 100

If a bank has lent ₹1,00,000 crore and ₹3,000 crore has gone bad, its Gross NPA ratio is 3%.

Also Read - How to Read a Cash Flow Statement

What Is Net NPA?

Net NPA (NNPA) is a refined number. Banks set aside money called provisions to provide for expected losses. Net NPA subtracts these provisions from the Gross NPA figure. As a result, Net NPA answers a more important question— after accounting for expected losses, how much risk still remains on the bank's books?

How to Calculate Net NPA?

Net NPA = Gross NPA − Provisions Net NPA Ratio = (Net NPA / Net Advances) × 100

If the same bank above has provisioned ₹2,000 crore against that ₹3,000 crore in bad loans, its Net NPA is only ₹1,000 crore. So now, this becomes a smaller residual risk.

Why Both Numbers Matter

Neither figure alone tells the full story.

Gross NPA reveals the scale of asset quality stress and may expose cracks in lending norms. A high and rising GNPA indicates that borrowers are struggling and the bank's lending procedures may need improvement . It's what analysts watch to spot trouble early.

Net NPA reveals the bank's proactiveness and resilience. A high GNPA but very low NNPA means the bank had anticipated these losses and made provisions for it, which in turn reduced the damage.

The gap between the two reflects the Provision Coverage Ratio (PCR). A higher PCR (ideally above 70%) means the bank has built strong defences.

A bank with GNPA of 4% but NNPA of 0.5% is in a vastly different position than one with GNPA of 4% and NNPA of 3%. The first has the problem covered; the second is genuinely exposed.

India's Big Picture: A Remarkable Turnaround

With respect to NPAs, Indian banks, both public sector and private banks have had exemplary transformation over the past decade. At the peak of the NPA crisis in 2018, Gross NPAs of scheduled commercial banks (SCBs) were as high as 11%. These alarming numbers, as per analysts, were largely due to reckless infrastructure lending, wilful defaults and inadequate oversight, and this left public sector banks in particular deeply stressed.

The turnaround began with the RBI's Asset Quality Review (AQR) in 2015, which forced banks to recognise NPAs they had been hiding, followed by the government's 4R strategy: Recognise, Resolve, Recapitalise, Reform.

The results have been remarkable. The ratio of Gross NPAs to gross advances declined to 2.1% as of September 2025 and Net NPAs fell to 0.5%, according to data from the RBI's Trends and Progress of Banking in India report. To put that in context, the gross NPA ratio of 2.15% as of September 2025 is a historic low. During 2024-25, approximately 42.8% of the reduction in GNPAs was attributable to recoveries and upgradations.

Also Read - Is FD Right Investment for You?

Bank-by-Bank Breakdown: FY2025 Results

State Bank of India (SBI)

SBI, the country's largest bank, has been one of the biggest beneficiaries of India's banking clean-up over the last few years. According to SBI's FY2024-25 Annual Report, its Gross NPA ratio fell to 1.82% as of March 2025, down 42 basis points from the previous year. Its Net NPA ratio improved to 0.47%, compared to 0.57% a year earlier. In absolute terms, gross bad loans declined by ₹7,396 crore to ₹76,880 crore.

The difference between the Gross NPA and Net NPA ratios shows that SBI has built a strong cushion against potential loan losses. The bank's Provision Coverage Ratio stood at 74.42%, meaning it had already set aside money to cover a large portion of its bad loans.

HDFC Bank

HDFC Bank has long been known as a conservative lender and it maintains one of the healthiest loan books in the banking sector. According to the bank's FY2024-25 annual report, its Gross NPA ratio stood at 1.33% as of March 31, 2025, compared with 1.24% a year earlier.

Net NPA stood at 0.43%, up from 0.33% in the previous year. So although there is an increase in stressed loans, the overall asset quality remains healthy by industry standards. The bank's annual report also shows that provisions and contingencies fell sharply to ₹3,190 crore in Q4FY25 from ₹13,510 crore a year earlier. This suggests that HDFC Bank made lower provisions for loan losses than it did in the previous year.

ICICI Bank

ICICI Bank's NPA journey is one of Indian exemplary stories. In 2020, its Net NPA was at 1.41%. By FY2025, the Net NPA ratio had declined to 0.39% as of March 31, 2025, down from 0.42% at December 2024, with a provisioning coverage ratio of 76.2%.

The improved performance is due to disciplined credit underwriting. The gross NPA ratio dropped to 1.97% in Q2FY25 from 2.48% in Q2FY24. By March 2025, ICICI Bank's Gross NPA had improved further to around 1.67%. The bank's PCR of over 76% means the Net NPA figure gives a realistic picture of residual risk that is well within manageable limits.

Axis Bank

Axis Bank has made tremendous efforts in cleaning up its balance sheet. Gross NPAs stood at ₹14,490 crore as of March 31, 2025, down from ₹15,157 crore a year earlier. The gross NPA ratio improved to 1.28% from 1.43% a year ago.

However, Net NPAs increased slightly to 0.33% as of March 31, 2025 from 0.31% a year ago, reflecting some pressure from unsecured retail loans, credit cards and personal loans. Despite stagnant profits during the year, the overall NPA picture remains healthy.

The Provisioning Bridge - How Gross Becomes Net

All these top four banks show a healthy spread between Gross and Net NPA.

Red Flags to Watch For

Not all NPA improvements are necessarily positive. Here are signs that need careful attention.

Rising Gross NPA with falling Net NPA - This can mean the bank is provisioning well (a good sign) or it may also be camouflaging deeper stress with accounting tactics (a negative scenario). Hence, always look at the PCR trend alongside.

Write-offs inflating the cleanup - Banks can reduce Gross NPAs by writing off loans, thereby removing them from the balance sheet entirely, just like that. So careful observation is required here. Recently, the slippage ratio of scheduled commercial banks declined for the fifth consecutive year to 1.4% in March 2025, suggesting real improvement rather than just write-offs.

Sector concentration - A bank heavily exposed to a single stressed sector (say, infrastructure or unsecured retail) may see its NPA ratios spike sharply if that segment deteriorates.

What This Means for You as an Investor or Depositor

For equity investors, watch the Net NPA trend above. It reflects the real financial exposure after provisions. A bank steadily reducing its Net NPA while maintaining a PCR above 70% is managing its portfolio well. Equally, track the slippage ratio to understand whether fresh bad loans are being created faster than old ones are being resolved.

For depositors, NPA ratios feed into overall bank stability. India's deposit insurance covers up to ₹5 lakh per depositor per ban., Beyond that, the bank's balance sheet health matters. Banks with low Gross and Net NPAs, combined with strong capital adequacy ratios, are your safest parking spots.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is more important,Gross NPA or Net NPA?

Both matter, but for different reasons. Gross NPA shows the overall scale of the bad loan problem. Net NPA shows the bank's real financial risk after its safety cushion. Investors typically watch Net NPA more closely because it reflects actual exposure.

What is a good NPA ratio for a bank in India?

Generally, a Gross NPA below 2–3% and a Net NPA below 1% are considered healthy. As of FY2025, top private banks like ICICI and Axis have Net NPAs below 0.4%, which is excellent.

What is the Provision Coverage Ratio (PCR)?

PCR tells you what percentage of its bad loans a bank has already covered through provisions. A PCR above 70% is considered healthy. ICICI Bank's PCR stood at 76.2% in FY2025, meaning it has covered over three-quarters of its bad loans.

Can a bank reduce its NPA just by writing off loans?

Yes and this is a common trick to watch out for. When a bank ‘writes off’ a loan, it removes it from the books, which makes the NPA ratio look better. But the money isn't actually recovered. Always check whether NPA improvement is from real recoveries or just write-offs.

Why did Indian banks have such high NPAs around 2018?

A combination of factors aggressive lending to big infrastructure and real-estate projects in the early 2010s, weak monitoring, and in some cases wilful defaults by large borrowers. The RBI's Asset Quality Review in 2015 forced banks to come clean on hidden NPAs, which is why the numbers spiked before they started recovering.

As a regular depositor, should I worry about a bank's NPA ratio?

Deposits up to ₹5 lakh per bank are protected by deposit insurance in India. If your deposits exceed that limit, then it's worth checking the bank's Net NPA ratio and capital adequacy. A bank with a Net NPA consistently below 1% and strong capital buffers is a safer place for larger deposits.