return to news
  1. Money jars and mental gymnastics: What are you really saving money for?

Upstox Originals

Money jars and mental gymnastics: What are you really saving money for?

Vivek Kaul

5 min read | Updated on October 16, 2024, 15:50 IST

Twitter Page
Linkedin Page
Whatsapp Page

SUMMARY

Have you ever done this - categorised your savings for different purposes - for a trip, for education, or for health? We all undertake mental accounting. That said, this can sometimes lead to inefficient financial behavior, like borrowing at high interest rates while holding savings elsewhere. Read to find out why a balanced approach to saving—prioritising long-term security without overly compartmentalising funds—is key to financial well-being.

Mental accounting can lead to inefficient financial decisions

Mental accounting can lead to inefficient financial decisions

Having written about the different aspects of money for more than two decades now, people often tend to talk to me about what they think about it, in particular about saving it. And one thing that I clearly see is that individuals like saving money for a certain goal. For their retirement years. For the education and weddings of their children. For a holiday. For their health expenses. To save taxes. And so on.

Now, this is a very natural human thing to do, given that we tend to place money in different mental accounts. Richard Thaler, a Nobel Prize-winning economist, who coined the term, defines it as “the inclination to categorise and treat money differently depending on where it comes from, where it is kept, and how it is spent”.

Let’s understand this a little more through a small story featuring Hollywood actors Gene Hackman and Dustin Hoffman, who were friends during their struggling days. As Thaler and Cass Sunstein write in Nudge—The Final Edition: “Hackman tells the story of visiting Hoffman's apartment and having his host ask him for a loan. Hackman agreed to the loan, but then they went into Hoffman's kitchen, where several mason jars were lined up on the counter each containing money. One jar was labelled 'rent,' another 'utilities,' and so forth. Hackman asked why, if Hoffman had so much money in jars, he could possibly need a loan, whereupon Hoffman pointed to the food jar, which was empty.”

Now, of course, this is an extreme example of the mental accounting of money, but it does explain the concept very clearly: In the minds of human beings money is not always fungible. But that's not really the case. While in the minds of people, money comes with labels, actual money really has no labels. In fact, the money in Hoffman’s different jars could have easily been used to pay for food and he didn’t really need to borrow money from Hackman.

As Thaler writes in Misbehaving—The Making of Behavioural Economics: “Money is fungible, meaning that it has no labels restricting what it can be spent on…The failure to treat various pots of money as fungible…is what makes…[mental] accounting…feasible.”

And this has its implications. As Thaler writes: “Wealth, too, is often separated into various mental accounts…This can lead to the odd behaviour of simultaneously borrowing at a high rate of interest and saving at a low rate, for example by keeping money in a savings account…while maintaining an outstanding balance on a credit card that charges interest at more than 20% per year.”

Now, for a trained personal finance mind this might seem like a rather silly example, but believe me I have come across many such examples over the years. People have more than enough money in their bank accounts and are continuing to pay a high rate of interest on their credit card debt. Even those who are short of money don’t understand that it may be possible to take on a personal loan at a lower rate of interest and repay the credit card debt.

Another funny example of mental accounting at work is how people treat tax refunds. As Gary Belsky and Thomas Gilovich write in Why Smart People Make Big Money Mistakes: “Consider tax refunds, for example. Many people categorise such payments from the government as found money—and spend it accordingly—even though a refund is nothing more than a deferred payment of salary.” To put it simply, a tax refund is your own money, which was with the government because you had overpaid tax, and it has now come back to you. It’s not a fresh income. Or for that matter, a lottery that you may have won.

Now, I started this piece with how people think about saving money. They need a goal. And a goal is basically nothing but a mental account. It gives people a purpose to save money for something that is important to them. And that’s a good thing.

But at the same time it can end up confusing some as well, especially when there is only so much money that can be saved or if the individual hasn’t really started saving money up until late in life or even without that. This leads to a situation where people often wonder: Should we save money for our retirement? Or health emergencies? Or for the education and weddings of our children? Now, these are important questions to ask.

Nonetheless, it is more important to remember that money is fungible and it can be used for whatever one deems to be important at a given point in time. Or as Morgan Housel writes in The Psychology of Money: “Everyone’s life is a continuous chain of surprises. Savings that aren’t earmarked for anything, in particular, is a hedge against life’s inevitable ability to surprise the hell out of you at the worst possible moment.”

So, money should be saved, because money should be saved. So, do that SIP. Keep topping up that recurring deposit account. Or that public provident fund account. Now, of course, you may not end up saving all the money you might need to meet the requirements totally, but some money is better than no money. Also, a sense of balance is necessary. Don’t end up overblowing money on children. There needs to be some money in the bank for the retirement years as well. And that’s the right way to think about money and savings, without really putting it into different mental accounts.

Disclaimer: Views and opinions expressed in the article are the author's own and do not reflect those of Upstox.

About The Author

Vivek Kaul
Vivek Kaul is an economic commentator and the author of Bad Money.

Next Story