Upstox Originals

6 min read | Updated on July 07, 2026, 13:41 IST
SUMMARY
How does a company add millions of subscribers, grow revenue by double digits and still see its stock plunge over 40%? Netflix's dramatic fall wasn't caused by one disaster, but by a series of small setbacks that forced investors to rethink its growth story. The result offers a lesson in how valuation, expectations and competition shape stock prices.

Netflix’s share price has fallen over 40% from its high. | Image: Shutterstock
A year ago, Netflix was the stock everyone wished they'd bought. In June 2025 it hit an all-time high of $133.91 a share, capping a three-year run that had turned it into one of the market's biggest winners. Twelve months later, it touched $70.86 — a 52-week low, and a fall of roughly 42% from that peak.
Here's the strange part. During the same period, the business behind the stock didn't shrink. It grew.
When a stock drops this hard, the instinct is to assume something went wrong. With Netflix, the fundamentals point the other way.
In 2025, revenue grew 16% to $45.2 billion. The company crossed 325 million paid memberships — up around 8% over the previous year, or roughly 24 million net new subscribers. Operating margin widened to 29.5% from 26.7%. Its advertising business, only in its third year, more than doubled to over $1.5 billion. And for 2026, Netflix expects a revenue of $50.7–51.7 billion — that’s 12–14% of growth.
So this isn't a story of a company falling apart. On almost every measure Netflix reports, 2025 was one of its strongest years yet. Which raises the real question: if the business is growing, why did the stock lose more than four in every ten dollars of its value?
The answer isn't one dramatic event. It's four smaller ones that landed close together — and one bigger, quieter shift underneath them all.
| The reason | What happened | Why did it dent confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Guidance stood still | After a strong Q1 (revenue growth of 16%), the management held full-year guidance flat instead of raising it. | A stock priced for acceleration needs to see acceleration. Holding steady is read as a quiet slowdown. |
| A failed mega-deal | Netflix lost its ~$83bn bid for Warner Bros. Discovery to Paramount Skydance (Feb 2026). | It removed a shortcut to a huge content library — HBO, Game of Thrones, the DC catalogue. |
| A second failed deal | Four months later, Netflix lost Roku to Fox's ~$22bn bid. | Two misses in a row raised doubts about the acquisition strategy investors were counting on. |
| The founder's exit | Co-founder Reed Hastings left the board after 29 years (Jun 2026). | A symbolic loss of the person most associated with Netflix's every previous reinvention. |
Individually, none of these would hurt a stock. Guidance held flat, not down. A break-up fee of $2.8 billion softened the Warner Bros. miss. Losing Roku may even have spared Netflix an antitrust headache, since Roku carries every rival's app too. And Hastings' exit had been signalled well in advance.
After June 2022, the company saw a multi-year bull run. A password-sharing crackdown, an ad-supported tier launched in November 2022, and years of margin expansion took the stock to an all-time closing high of $133.91 on June 30, 2025 — a gain of more than 600% in three years.
As seen in the table below, the stock traded close to 40x its earnings at its peak.
| Measure | Multiple (P/E) |
|---|---|
| Netflix, current | ~24.6x |
| Netflix, 3-year average | ~41.6x |
| Netflix, 5-year average | ~39.2x |
| Peer average (Disney, Amazon, Alphabet, Fox) | ~21.0x |
| Disney, standalone | ~15.0x |
At such elevated valuations, expectations also run high, so any miss can lead to a sharper-than-expected reaction from investors. In the case of Netflix, all four events mentioned above at such high valuations leave little room for growth.
Stack all the events together and a pattern forms. Netflix wasn't just being asked to keep growing — it was being asked to prove it still had several avenues for growth. The two failed deals were, at their heart, the same bet made twice: that Netflix could buy its way past the slow, costly work of expanding on its own. Losing both meant the market suddenly had to value Netflix on its organic engine alone.
Netflix's own shareholder letter measures success against total television time — and by that yardstick, its biggest rival is YouTube. According to Nielsen's data for January 2026, Netflix accounted for 8.8% of all US TV screen time. YouTube took 12.5% — the single largest share of any platform, streaming or otherwise.
That matters because YouTube plays a completely different game. Its content is made by creators, not funded by a roughly $20 billion annual budget the way Netflix's is. As viewing drifts toward free, algorithm-fed video, Netflix faces a competitor it can't simply outspend.
Neither Warner Bros. nor Roku would have changed that. One would have deepened Netflix's library; the other extended its distribution. Neither wins back attention that's migrating to a rival with almost no content costs.
Put together, the sell-off looks less like panic and more like a recalculation. A three-year rally had priced Netflix as a company with many growth levers to pull.
Within months, two of those levers were tried and lost, a founder stepped away, and guidance suggested the easy acceleration was behind it. What's left is a still-growing, still-profitable business — but one the market now has to judge on a single storyline instead of several.
For anyone watching the stock, the takeaway isn't whether Netflix is cheap or expensive today. It's that a falling share price and a growing business can both be true at once, because markets price the future, not the present.
Netflix's next results, due on July 16, will update the numbers. The harder question — whether a subscription business can keep winning attention from a free one — won't be settled on any single earnings day.
About The Author

Next Story